We acted for the first Chinese case in which an arbitration award
rendered in Japan was recognized in China (Please refer to JCA Journal
vol. 49, issue 12, December 2002).
As you know, with respect to the court judgment, Chinese precedent
case exists in which a request for enforcement of a judgment by the
Japanese court in China was rejected. According to said case, it
is considered that a judgment by the Chinese court cannot be recognized
in Japan, where reciprocal guarantee is required for the recognition
of foreign judgment (Articles 22.3 and 24 of the Law of Civil Execution
of Japan, Article 118 of the Civil Litigation Law). In other words,
reciprocal enforcement system for the court judgment has not been
established yet between Japan and China.
On the other hand, since both Japan and China are members of “New
York Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration
Awards (New York Treaty)”, there is a system to obtain recognition
of and to enforce the arbitration award rendered in Japan or China
by the court of the other country. In fact, there are some cases
in which the award by CIETAC, an arbitration association for international
dispute in China, was recognized by the Japanese courts. However,
there was no precedent case in which the Chinese court recognized
the arbitration award by the Japanese court until the initial case
represented by us.
In the case, Shanghai First Intermediate People’s Court recognized
and enforced the arbitration award by the Japan Commercial Arbitration
Association. Consequently, it was indicated as a case that it is
possible to reciprocally enforce arbitration awards between China
and Japan.
We are able to provide extensive service in relation to application
for recognition and execution of the international arbitration award
in China, concerning filing method, filing period, translation of
legal documents, tax operation and overseas remittance. 
[ Japanese ]
[ Chinese ]